Read here. New research published today by Andy Dessler, an IPCC Climategate scientist, appears to have major shortcomings. His new study was greased, like goose leavings, through the peer reviewed process in just a few weeks, which may have contributed to the work’s shoddiness. (C3H)
New Santer et al. Paper Totally Discredited – Santer Ignores Prior, Pivotal Peer Reviewed Research
Read here. The violence-prone and globally discredited Ben Santer has Climategate friends (Kevin Trenberth and Andy Dessler) who recently claimed that the Spencer and Braswell 2011 study is invalid because it did not include prior research to their liking. (C3H)
Read here. Santer et al. 2011 research supposedly determines that at least 17-years of data is required to “measure” humans’ impact on the climate. Not 15-years, not 16, not 18, not 19, not 20, but most assuredly, their cherry-picked 17-year span is the new gold-standard. (C3H)
