Daily Archives: June 30, 2011

Oh noes! Wasting less time (being more productive) uses more energy – liberates more plant food!

Raising speed limit on motorways threatens climate change target warn Government advisers
Minister’s plans to raise the speed limit on motorways to 80mph would increase carbon and cost the economy billions, Government climate change advisers have warned.
By Louise Gray

Philip Hammond, the Transport Secretary, has signalled that he is ready to lift the 70mph limit to 80mph if it is in the interests of British business to speed up journeys.

But in its latest ‘progress report’ the Committee on Climate Change, led by Lord Adair Turner, warns cars travelling at 80mph emit far more carbon.
Allowing cars to drive faster would mean an extra five million tonnes of carbon is produced every year, which would cost the economy £150 million because of growing taxes on pollution. (TDT)

27% more of not very much is still not very much

Power from green sources surges – but so does coal consumption
Terry Macalister

Britain’s green energy sector produced 27% more electricity in the first quarter of the year compared with the same period last year as the rapid expansion of offshore wind capacity started to bear fruit, official figures have revealed.

Renewables and nuclear both increased their low-carbon output – but the environmental benefits were undermined by power companies using 7% more coal. (Guardian)

Early Monckton coverage from down-under

Monckton blasts Australia over climate change ‘scam’
Andrew Burrell

BRITISH climate change sceptic Christopher Monckton has lashed out at the Australian media, governments and climate scientists for failing to question the ”scam” of global warming, claiming Julia Gillard’s proposed carbon tax will push Australia into economic oblivion. (The Australian)

Australia headed for disaster: Monckton
AAP

Controversial climate change sceptic Lord Christopher Monckton says Australia will be tossed into the Third World if it succumbs to what he calls the federal government’s socialist agenda.

Lord Monckton lashed out at both the “hypocrisy” of the Australian media and the federal government’s “socialism” after speaking at a mining conference in Perth. (Sydney Morning Herald)

Recycling the “aerosols masking warming” excuse again

European research effort improves understanding of impacts of aerosols on climate

Pan-European research effort improves the understanding of the impacts of aerosols and trace gases on climate and air quality

Atmospheric aerosol particles (otherwise known as Particulate Matter) have been masking the true rate of greenhouse gas induced global warming during the industrial period. New investigations show that the aerosol cooling effect will be strongly reduced by 2030, as air pollution abatements are implemented worldwide and the presently available advanced control technologies are utilized. These actions would increase the global mean temperature by ca. 1 degree Celsius. This is one of the main research outcomes of the recently concluded EU EUCAARI (European Integrated project on Aerosol Cloud Climate and Air Quality Interaction) project. (EurekAlert)

More fun with unintended consequences

(Daily Bayonet)

Roger Pielke Sr. on biased climate reporting by Tom Karl and Peter Thorne

Continued Bias Reporting On The Climate System By Tom Karl and Peter Thorne

Today, there were news articles concerning the state of the climate system; e.g. see the Associated Press news release in the Washington Post

Climate change study: More than 300 months since the planets temperature was below average

The news article refers to the 2010 climate summary that will be published in a Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society article. The article will undoubtedly include informative information on the climate.

However, the news article itself erroneously reports on the actual state of the climate, as can easily be shown simply by extracting current analyses from the web. Two of the prominent individuals quoted in the news report are Tom Karl and Peter Thorne. (Roger Pielke Sr.)

Dragging another foolish scare out of the virtual realm

Farm animal disease to increase with climate change

Researchers looked at changes in the behaviour of bluetongue – a viral disease of cattle and sheep – from the 1960s to the present day, as well as what could happen to the transmission of the virus 40 years into the future. They found, for the first time, that an outbreak of a disease could be explained by changes to the climate.

In Europe, more than 80,000 outbreaks of bluetongue were reported to the World Animal Health Organisation between 1998 and 2010, and millions of animals died as a result of the disease. Bluetongue was previously restricted to Africa and Asia, but its emergence in Europe is thought to be linked to increased temperatures, which allows the insects that carry the virus to spread to new regions and transmit the virus more effectively.

Researchers produced a mathematical model that explains how the risk of an outbreak of bluetongue virus in Europe changes under different climate conditions. The team examined the effect of past climate on the risk of the virus over the past 50 years to understand the specific triggers for disease outbreak over time and throughout geographical regions. This model was then driven forwards in time, using predictive climate models, to the year 2050, to show how the disease may react to future climate change. (EurekAlert)

Keenan on CRU, open data and the Royal Society

UEA fired at feet – Royal Society replicated the experiment
By Andrew Orlowski

Doug Keenan, the statistician whose work highlighted severe flaws in the work of the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia, has welcomed the Sunshine order to open up the station records.

Scientists need the raw data to replicate temperature records, but CRU refused to release the data requested – a subset of weather station records from around the world – to a top UK Oxford physicist, despite having already shared the data with Georgia Tech in the United States.

The ICO comprehensively demolished the reasons CRU offered – including intellectual property and fear of jeopardising international relations. In doing so, it’s raised the standard for academics working across all UK sciences. (The Register)

The AAAS’s advocacy is showing

Threats could have chilling effect on climate research, science group says
By Andrew Restuccia

Personal attacks — including legal challenges and even death threats — on climate scientists have created a “hostile environment” that could result in a “chilling effect” on much-needed research, one of the country’s leading scientific organizations said this week.

The board of directors of the American Association for the Advancement of Science issued a rare statement Tuesday underscoring that it “vigorously opposes” personal attacks on climate scientists. It’s the organization’s strongest rebuke of efforts by conservative groups to criticize climate scientists. (E2 Wire)

Response to AAAS from ATI Environmental Law Center director of litigation Christopher Horner:

“I noticed no relation between our initiative and the AAAS Board’s rhetoric until they mentioned us somewhat incongruously.

“The notion that application of laws that expressly cover academics is an ‘attack’ on them is substantively identical to Hollywood apologists who call application of other laws to Roman Polanski an attack on Polanski. They lost the plot somewhere along the way.

“AAAS’s failure to mention the group that invented this series of requests, Greenpeace, informs our conclusion that this outrage is selective, and is therefore either feigned or hypocritical. Their problem is plainly with the laws, but it is a problem they have had over the decades: That transparency and ethics laws also apply to scientists who subsist on taxpayer revenue. This they also forgot to mention. (ATI)

Warmist scandals, economic hardship cool concern over global warming

ROTHBARD & RUCKER: The U.N.’s climate of desperation
Warmist scandals, economic hardship cool concern over global temperatures

As the United Nations wrapped up its recent climate conference in Bonn, talks organizer Christiana Figueres proclaimed that climate change is the “the most important negotiation the world has ever faced.” Faced with real problems – financial meltdowns, unemployment, war and genuine human suffering – the world no longer agrees. (Washington Times)