Daily Archives: May 15, 2011

WSJ does renewable energy, Australia has moved to reliable energy and people hoping to profit from government subsidies get what they deserve – losses.

Earth’s Next Generation
The pros and cons of renewable energy sources

The use and prominence of renewable energy, which uses natural resources with no finite supply, such as wind and sunlight, has been on the rise. In China, the planet’s biggest polluter, renewable energy could form 26% of the country’s energy mix by 2030, according to a report by the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership. In the U.K., renewable energy has been described as the ‘first pillar’ of the country’s future energy plan.

Continue reading

Paul Epstein & Dan Ferber fantasize about global warming health hazards – again

Climate change bringing infection, hunger, illness

Climate change threatens far more than our environment. It’s already led to the spread of infectious diseases and respiratory ailments across the globe and contributed to thousands of deaths through heat waves and other extreme weather events. It’s even fueled recent revolts in the Middle East and North Africa.

That’s according to Dan Ferber and Dr. Paul Epstein, the authors of a new book, Changing Planet, Changing Health: How the Climate Crisis Threatens Our Health and What We Can Do about It (University of California Press, April 2011). (Reuters Health)

Meanwhile, in the real world:

Continue reading

Professor Motl CLOUD interview and pending results

CLOUD: cosmic rays producing lots of them

Nigel Calder has pointed out the following interview in Physics Worldabout CERN’s CLOUD experiment:

In that interview, CLOUD’s boss Jasper Kirkby answers lots questions – like what are the cosmic rays and whether the climate scientists in the world agree that someone should be allowed to believe, as a heretic, that the clouds may affect the weather. ;-)

Kirkby is giving lots of relevant answers and he also credits Nigel Calder himself for some early motivation to build the experiment more than a decade ago.

The main punch line is that the experiment has found that the cosmic rays substantially increase the production of the aerosol seeds of clouds. They have also measured the detailed evolution of the size of those particles and within 2 or 3 months, we will see some published results. (The Reference Frame)

For those thinking/hoping Australia might tax carbon [dioxide] the news is all bad

The Abbott-led Conservative Opposition has a blanket “reject or repeal” carbon price policy, which means even if by some trickery or political slight of hand the green-left-confused conglomerate government of the day should manage to impose a “carbon price” it will be permanently repealed at the next election. Such election will be sooner rather than later because this government is so incompetent even the blatantly partisan Governor General Quentin Bryce will be forced to dissolve it before full term (nominally 3 years).

Newspoll: Julia Gillard’s standing at new low as voters give Budget the thumbs down

Continue reading

Yet another attempt to show people why the greenhouse effect does not conflict with the 2nd law of thermodynamics

Why greenhouse gas warming doesn’t break the second law of thermodynamics

This is generating many comments, see below for an update!

Behind the scenes some skeptics are suggesting that CO2 can’t warm us because the atmosphere is colder than the planet, and  it would break the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics (see Postma*, for example, p 6 – 7). I disagree. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics applies to net flows of heat, not to each individual photon, and it does not prevent some heat flowing from a cooler body to a warm one.

Imagine three blocks of metal side by side. They are 11°C, 10°C, and 9°C. Think about what happens to the photons coming off the atoms in the middle of the medium temperature block between the other two. If heat never flows from cooler blocks to warmer blocks, all those photons have to go “right“, and not ever go “left”, because they “know” that way is towards a cooler block? (How would they?!)

The photons go both ways (actually every way, in 3D). There are more coming from the 11°C block to the 10°C block, sure, but the the 10°C block is sending ‘em back to the 11°C block too. So heat is flowing from cold to hot. It happens all the time. Net heat is flowing always hot to cold. But some heat is going the other way, every day, everywhere, bar possibly a black hole.

People are being caught by semantics. Technically, strictly, greenhouse gases don’t “warm” the planet (as in, they don’t supply additional heat energy), but they slow the cooling, which for all pragmatic purposes leaves the planet warmer that it would have been without them. It’s a bit like saying a blanket doesn’t warm you in bed. Sure, it’s got no internal heat source, and it won’t add any heat energy that you didn’t already have, but you sure feel cold without one. –  Jo (JoNova)