Granted, they start in error with the PC statement that “global warming is clearly affecting plants and animals” – no it isn’t, only local conditions can do that and there’s no evidence plants and/or animals generally are being affected by the globe’s estimated 0.5-1.0 °C warming since the Little Ice Age.
They really bomb with ”Yes, global warming is happening. Yes, it is caused by human activities. And yes, we’ve clearly shown that species are impacted by global warming on a global scale” but at least they recover somewhat with “However, research funding is limited, and the scientists feel it should be directed more toward studies on species adaptations and conservation of compromised species rather than trying to figure what percent of each species’ decline is due to rising greenhouse gases. One reason is that, from the perspective of wildlife, it doesn’t matter what proportion of climate-change impacts are caused by humans. ”A changing climate is a changing climate, irrespective of its cause,” write the scientists.”“
They are a long way from realizing “global warming” is irrelevant to all intent and purpose but… baby steps
